Comparing two propofol methods for dream experiences in healthy adults
Tests two propofol sedation methods to study dreams in healthy adults.
Plain-language title generated from the registry record
Registry title: Induction of Dreaming With EEG and Anesthesia in Healthy Adults
Key facts
- Where
- Stanford, United StatesSee the site
- Phase
- Phase 1
Could this be for you?
Answer for yourself. This is not a decision: only the study team can say whether you can take part.
- Are you between 18 and 70 years old?
Source: NCT07198711, who can take part
Where in United States
- Stanford UniversityStanford, United StatesNo longer taking part
Questions to ask the study team
- How often do I need to come in, and for how long each time?
- Are travel costs paid?
- Can I keep my own doctor?
- What happens if I want to stop?
Trial details
- Who runs it
- Stanford University
- Trial code
- NCT07198711
- Record updated
- 22 June 2026
- Original description
This open-label, randomized crossover study in healthy adults tests two propofol protocols to produce distinct experiential states. One induces brief loss of responsiveness with spontaneous emergence, intended to elicit dream reports; the other maintains light sedation without loss of responsiveness, intended to elicit non-dream experiences while participants remain responsive. The main goals are to (a) measure the protocol-concordant experiential report rate (how often each method produces its intended experience), (b) explore EEG correlates of these experiences in the two states, and (c) describe their phenomenology (what they are like). We will also examine short-term changes in well-being and sleep related to these experiences. Participants complete four sessions (two of each method) with EEG and routine monitoring, immediate post-session interviews, and brief questionnaires and daily sleep/dream logs before and after anesthesia sessions.Read full original descriptionShow less
Comparison of Ketamine Versus Saline During Sedation in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: a Double-blind Trial
This open-label, randomized crossover study in healthy adults tests two propofol protocols to produce distinct experiential states. One induces brief loss of responsiveness with spontaneous emergence, intended to elicit dream reports; the other maintains light sedation without loss of responsiveness, intended to elicit non-dream experiences while participants remain responsive. The main goals are to (a) measure the protocol-concordant experiential report rate (how often each method produces its intended experience), (b) explore EEG correlates of these experiences in the two states, and (c) describe their phenomenology (what they are like). We will also examine short-term changes in well-being and sleep related to these experiences. Participants complete four sessions (two of each method) with EEG and routine monitoring, immediate post-session interviews, and brief questionnaires and daily sleep/dream logs before and after anesthesia sessions.
Inclusion: Male or female, 18 to 70 years of age, inclusive, at screen; Able to read, understand, and provide written, dated informed consent prior to screening. Participants will be deemed likely to comply with study protocol and communicate with study personnel about adverse events and other clinically important information; In sufficiently good health to proceed with a low risk elective procedure, characterized using the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system as Class 1 or 2; If female, a status of non-childbearing potential or use of an acceptable form of birth control; Body mass index between 17-35 kg/m2.
Exclusion: Any endocrine disorder including:; uncontrolled diabetes, type 1 or 2; History of hypothyroidism and has been on a stable dosage of thyroid replacement medication for less than six months prior to screening. (Subjects on a stable dosage of thyroid replacement medication for at least six months or more prior to screening are eligible for enrollment.); History of hyperthyroidism which was treated (medically or surgically) less than six months prior to screening; Other endocrine disorder that would merit categorization of patient as ASA Class 3 or higher; Patients taking any of the following daily medications:; opioids including buprenorphine and methadone; naltrexone or other opioid antagonist; clonidine; Participation in any clinical trial with an investigational drug or device that conflicts with this trial, within the past month or concurrent to study participation; Current diagnosis of a Substance Use Disorder (SUD; Abuse or Dependence, as defined by DSM-V) rated "moderate" or "severe", or Alcohol Use Disorder rated "moderate" or "severe". The following categories of SUD will NOT be excluded: nicotine dependence; alcohol or substance use disorder rated "mild"; alcohol or substance use disorder of any severity in remission, either early (3-12 months) or sustained (>12 months) time frames; Current diagnosis of Axis I disorders other than Dysthymic Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Social Anxiety Disorder, Panic Disorder, Agoraphobia, Specific Phobia, or Bipolar II Disorder; History of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders, or any history of psychotic symptoms; History of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, or eating disorder not otherwise specified, within five years of screening; A neurological disorder including:; Has dementia, delirium, amnestic, or any other cognitive disorder; Lifetime history of surgical procedures involving the brain or meninges,; encephalitis, meningitis, degenerative central nervous system disorder (e.g., Alzheimer's or Parkinson's Disease), epilepsy, mental retardation; any other disease/procedure/accident/intervention associated with significant injury to or malfunction of the central nervous system (CNS),; history of significant head trauma within the past two years; A cardiovascular disorder including:; uncontrolled hypertension; Congestive heart failure NYHA Criteria >Stage 2; Atrial fibrillation or resting heart rate <50 or >105 beats per minute at screening or randomization; Any conduction abnormalities including AV nodal block of any type or intraventricular conduction delay; QTcF (Fridericia-corrected) >= 450 msec at screening or randomization; any cardiovascular disorder that would merit categorization of patient as ASA Class 3 or higher; A pulmonary/respiratory disorder including:; diagnosed Obstructive Sleep Apnea or STOPBANG score of 3 or higher; History of difficult airway in surgical setting; any pulmonary / respiratory disorder that would merit categorization of patient as ASA Class 3 or higher; Clinically significant liver disease, determined by LFTs within the past 6 months; Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease, hiatal hernia, or other gastrointestinal disorder placing patient at risk for aspiration or that would merit categorization of patient as ASA Class 3 or higher; Has a clinically significant abnormality on the screening physical examination that might affect safety, study participation or confound interpretation of study results, including any condition that would merit categorization of patient as ASA Class 3 or higher; Clinically significant kidney disease determined by creatinine / GFR within the past 6 months; Any other clinically significant abnormal laboratory result at the time of the screening exam; Female of childbearing potential who is not willing to use one of the specified forms of birth control during the study; Female that is pregnant or breastfeeding; Female with a positive pregnancy test at screening or baseline; In the judgment of the investigator, the subject is at significant risk for suicidal behavior during the course of his/her participation in the study.