Heart pump and monitoring tests in heart attack patients with cardiogenic shock
Tests a heart pump and catheter monitoring in adults with heart attack-related cardiogenic shock.
Key facts
- Who runs it
- Leipzig Heart Science gGmbH
- Where
- Leipzig, GermanySee the site
- Trial code
- Registry title
- Routine Microaxial Heart Pump Support and Protocolized Pulmonary Artery Catheter Monitoring Versus Standard Care in Heart Attack-Related Cardiogenic Shock
- Status
- Recruiting
- People taking part
- 780 people, planned
- Started
- 31 Oct 2026
- Expected to end
- Apr 2037
- Type of study
- Interventional, 4 groupsOne group gets an existing treatment, for comparison.
- Treatments tested
- Microaxial flow pump (left ventricular assist device)
- Pulmonary artery catheter
- Conventional hemodynamic monitoring
- Hemodynamic stabilization
- Record updated
- 9 November 2026
Who can take part
AI summary
From the trial's eligibility criteria. Machine-read from the registry text on this page, so it can be wrong. The registry text below and the trial team decide who can take part.
The trial is looking for adults aged 18 to 80 with cardiogenic shock (the heart cannot pump enough blood) caused by a heart attack. It compares a heart pump and catheter-based monitoring with standard care.
- Age
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All sexes can join.
- Disease stage
- Heart attack (STEMI or NSTEMI) with cardiogenic shock. Planned immediate angiography and revascularization (preferably PCI). Systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg or catecholamines needed to keep it above 90 mmHg. Arterial lactate >2.0 mmol/L. Heart ultrasound showing LVEF <40% or LVOT-VTI ≤12 cm (4.7 in).
- Biomarker or test result
- Arterial lactate >2.0 mmol/L; LVEF <40% or LVOT-VTI ≤12 cm (4.7 in) on heart ultrasound.
Main reasons for not taking part
- Shock lasting more than 12 hours
- Shock from other causes (low blood volume, sepsis, pulmonary embolism, anaphylaxis) or from a mechanical complication of the heart attack
- Cardiac arrest with ongoing chest compression, or an unwitnessed cardiac arrest outside hospital
- Severe right heart failure, severe aortic valve disease, or a mechanical aortic valve
- Known pregnancy
The registry criteria, word for word
Show all 23 criteriaShow less
Who can take part
- Cardiogenic shock complicating AMI (STEMI or NSTEMI) plus obligatory all 4 of these:
- Planned immediate angiography and revascularization (preferred PCI)
- Systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg or catecholamines required to maintain pressure >90 mmHg during systole
- Arterial lactate >2.0 mmol/L
- Echocardiogram with LVEF <40% or left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT-VTI) ≤12 cm
Who cannot take part
- Witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with chest compression >10 min in total (cardiac arrest occurring in ambulance or after hospital arrival is NOT an exclusion criterion and witnessed OHCA with duration of chest compression <10 min are also eligible)
- Refractory cardiac arrest with ongoing chest compression
- Evidence of severe right ventricular failure
- Severe peripheral arterial obstructive disease precluding mAFP placement
- Mental disorder or language barrier that preclude informed consent
- Age <18 and >80 years
- Shock duration >12 hours
- Other causes of shock (hypovolemia, sepsis, pulmonary embolism or anaphylaxis)
- Shock due to mechanical complication of AMI
- After 390 included patients with OHCA, any OHCA will be an exclusion criterion
- Any unwitnessed OHCA
- Severe aorta valve regurgitation/stenosis
- Abnormalities of the aorta precluding mAFP device placement
- Presence of a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis
- Left ventricular thrombus
- Infective endocarditis
- Life expectancy <1 year due to comorbidities
- Known pregnancy
Check if you might fit
Answer for yourself. This is not a decision: only the study team can say whether you can take part.
- Are you between 18 and 80 years old?
Where in Germany
- Heart Center Leipzig at University of LeipzigLeipzig, GermanyContact: DOUBLE SHOCK Leipzig Heart Science gGmbHTaking people
About the trial
What the trial wants to find out
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn which treatment strategies improve survival in adult patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS).
Read full original descriptionShow less
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Does the immediate use of a left-sided microaxial flow pump (Impella) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improve survival compared to initial medical therapy alone? * Does protocol-based hemodynamic monitoring and optimization using a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) improve survival compared to conventional intensive care monitoring?
Researchers will compare four treatment combinations to see if mechanical circulatory support and/or advanced hemodynamic monitoring reduce mortality in AMI-CS patients:
* Microaxial flow pump + pulmonary artery catheter * Microaxial flow pump + conventional monitoring * Medical therapy alone + pulmonary artery catheter * Medical therapy alone + conventional monitoring
Participants will:
* Undergo immediate coronary angiography and PCI upon hospital admission Be randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups * Receive either immediate implantation of a microaxial flow pump or initial medical therapy with vasoactive agents following PCI * Be monitored either via pulmonary artery catheter with protocol-based hemodynamic optimization or via conventional intensive care monitoring * Be followed up at 30 days, 6 months and 12 monthsafter Randomization, with planned annual follow-up assessments for up to 10 years
The 4 groups in the trial
- Microaxial flow pump + pulmonary artery catheterTreatment being tested
Participants in this arm undergo immediate implantation of a left-sided microaxial flow pump (Impella) via the femoral artery following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The device is used to unload the left ventricle and augment cardiac output until hemodynamic stabilization is achieved. In addition, participants receive a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) inserted via a central venous access (jugular, subclavian, or femoral vein) for continuous hemodynamic monitoring and protocol-based optimization of cardiovascular function. Target parameters include, e.g., cardiac output, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance.
Treatment: Microaxial flow pump (left ventricular assist device) and Pulmonary artery catheter
- Microaxial flow pump + conventional monitoringTreatment being tested
Participants in this arm undergo immediate implantation of a left-sided microaxial flow pump (Impella) via the femoral artery following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The device is used to unload the left ventricle and augment cardiac output until hemodynamic stabilization is achieved. Hemodynamic monitoring is performed using conventional intensive care methods, including arterial blood pressure measurement, central venous catheter, echocardiography, and serial laboratory parameters. No pulmonary artery catheter is inserted.
Treatment: Microaxial flow pump (left ventricular assist device) and Conventional hemodynamic monitoring
- Medical therapy + pulmonary artery catheterExisting treatment, for comparison
Participants in this arm receive initial hemodynamic stabilization through guideline-recommended medical therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), without immediate implantation of a mechanical circulatory support device. In case of refractory cardiogenic shock unresponsive to medical therapy, escalation to mechanical circulatory support is permitted at the discretion of the treating physician. In addition, participants receive a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) inserted via a central venous access (jugular, subclavian, or femoral vein) for continuous hemodynamic monitoring and protocol-based optimization of cardiovascular function. Target parameters include e.g., cardiac output, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance.
Treatment: Pulmonary artery catheter and Hemodynamic stabilization
- Medical therapy + conventional monitoringExisting treatment, for comparison
Participants in this arm receive initial hemodynamic stabilization through guideline-directed medical therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), without immediate implantation of a mechanical circulatory support device. In case of refractory cardiogenic shock unresponsive to medical therapy, escalation to mechanical circulatory support is permitted at the discretion of the treating physician. Hemodynamic monitoring is performed using conventional intensive care methods, including arterial blood pressure measurement, central venous catheter, echocardiography, and serial laboratory parameters. No pulmonary artery catheter is inserted. All participants receive standard intensive care treatment as clinically indicated.
Treatment: Conventional hemodynamic monitoring and Hemodynamic stabilization
Questions to ask the study team
- How often do I need to come in, and for how long each time?
- Are travel costs paid?
- Can I keep my own doctor?
- What happens if I want to stop?
Contact the study team: see the registry record → Contacts and Locations
Print a page for my doctorData and sources
- Registry record
- Listed on ClinicalTrials.gov.
- Official title
- Routine Microaxial Flow Pump Versus Radial Access Revascularization Without Routine Microaxial Flow Pump in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock & Routine Pulmonary Artery Catheterization-based Monitoring With Protocolized Hemodynamic Optimization Versus Simplified Monitoring Without Protocolized Hemodynamic Optimization in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock
- Plain-language title
- Heart pump and monitoring tests in heart attack patients with cardiogenic shockGenerated from the registry record. The registry title is the official one.
- AI summary
- From the trial's eligibility criteria. Read by machine on 12 November 2026.
- Fit questions
- Built from NCT07762560, who can take part
- Record updated
- 9 November 2026